CASO Reactor

The problem of Blowdec reactor that is supposedly being solved by the “invention” of CASO reactor by Mr. Anders Olsson does not exist and the solution of it with Mr. Olsson’s technique is not being improved. On the contrary, it is being worsened. This claim does not apply only to the issue of access to the vanes and inner parts of the reactor; it also applies to the entire construction/design of the reactor’s concept. That is because the construction suggests the ‘hung’ rotor without any support on one of the ends with the heavy construction placed on the end which remains unsupported. The consequence of such construction is a huge bending moment of the shaft, resulting in heavier and stronger rotor and bearings construction, what is a more expensive and more complicated variant of our patented device. Vibrations and resonance of rotating mass od CASO reactor are very probable. The exerted construction of Blowdec reactor brings simpler, logical, cheaper and attested solution.

The purpose of the illogical constructed concept of chemical reactor with the ‘hung’ curl with no support on one side is undoubtedly an effort of Anders Olsson to try and differentiate his patent from patents of Ivan Madar and Roil Trade s.r.o. irrespective of the unfavourable technical and economical consequences of the unprofitable solution. The Mr. Olsson’s “invention”  was developed with the goal to create an illusion of new technical solution and to legalize the abuse of the extensive amount of restricted technical information, which Mr. Anders Olsson gained about the Blowdec technology in years 2007 – 2009.

More detail evaluation can by found (click) here.

Mr. Anders Olsson International Patent Application WO2011/078779 can be found (click) here.

PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability of Mr. Olsson "invention" saying Lack of Novelty, Lack of Inovative Step in light of the information given in US Patent 6,165,349 can be found (click) here.

US patent  No. 6,165,349 can be found (click) here.